Trump-supporters outside the Capitol, Jack Dorsey, Prince Harry. Prince Harry said he had predicted the US Capitol riot while discussing social media misinformation and hate posted about Meghan Markle.
Prince Harry said he contacted the social media giant (Picture: Getty/WIRED)

Prince Harry ‘warned’ Twitter boss Jack Dorsey that people were using his platform to plan the Capitol riots.

The Duke of Sussex said the internet was ‘defined by hate, division and lies’ during a WIRED discussion on misinformation in social media.

When asked if he had ever ‘presented his case’ to the heads of social media companies, Harry revealed he actually predicted the January 6 uprising and told Mr Dorsey.

He said: ‘Jack and I were emailing each other, prior to January 6, where I warned him that his platform was allowing a coup to be staged.

‘That email was sent the day before and I haven’t heard from him since.’

Trump supporters stormed the Capitol after the former president lost the 2021 election to Joe Biden.

Five people died in the chaos and 691 people have since been arrested and charged with crimes.

Trump’s Twitter account was banned that day after the Republican was accused of using his platform to incite violence.

This has led to many conversations about the role social media plays in spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.

Tragically, five people died in the chaos on January 6 (Picture: Getty)
Jack Dorsey allowed Twitter to ban Donald Trump from his platform on the day of the riot (Picture: Getty)

However, social media companies have the difficult task of de-platforming untrue information while maintaining people’s right to freedom of speech.

There is very little legislation for these companies to fall back on, as most existing publishing laws cover the journalistic media – which has ethical and legal codes that hold editorial decisions accountable.

Facebook and Twitter have tried to create a similar system by holding users accountable to their community guidelines.

But this has also faced backlash, either for not being strict enough or for ‘silencing people’.

‘The scariest part about this is you don’t need to be online to be affected by this. It’s important to recognise this problem did not originate in social media.

‘I learned from a very early age that the incentives of publishing are not necessarily aligned with the incentives of truth.’

Harry also said it was ‘misogynist’ to use the term ‘Megxit’ to refer to he and his wife quitting their roles as senior royals (Picture: Getty)
Meghan said she was campaigning for paid leave because she was ‘standing up for what is right’ (Picture: Calla Kessler for The New York Times)

It comes as the Prince dubbed ‘Megxit’ a ‘misogynistic term’ as he discussed how most of the hate speech posted about Meghan could be traced back to less than 50 accounts allowed to stay online.

He said: ‘Maybe people know this and maybe they don’t, but the term “Megxit” was or is a misogynistic term, and it was created by a troll, amplified by royal correspondents, and it grew and grew and grew into mainstream media. But it began with a troll.’

The Sussexes have fallen under renewed criticism for being recently outspoken about several issues when the Royal Family is supposed to remain neutral.

Meghan has been using her title to cold call Republicans, campaigning for parental leave.

She said: ‘I don’t see this as a political issue frankly.

‘Look, there is certainly a precedent amongst my husband’s family and the royal family of not having any involvement in politics, but I think this is… I mean, paid leave, from my standpoint, is just a humanitarian issue.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *